|
Domestic Modes of Liability in Universal Jurisdiction Cases: The Case of Eyad Al-Gharib in Koblenz, Germany
|
|
Risky Business: will TotalEnergies be complicit in international crimes if it continues doing business in Russia?
|
|
Who could be held responsible for ecocide under the Rome Statute?
|
|
Almost 25 years after its creation, the Russia-Ukraine conflict sadly shows the increasing irrelevance of the International Criminal Court
|
|
Corporate complicity in Myanmar: beyond Facebook
|
|
Aiding and abetting liability for social media platforms in relation to ‘image-based sexual abuse’ – a way around Article 14 (1) of EU Directive 2000/31?
|
|
Re-innovating the grapes of wrath: the responsibility of Russian cluster munitions manufacturers under the Rome Statute
|
|
A Different Type of Tech Support: Examining secondary criminal liability for online assistance to offline crimes
|
|
An arms trade case at the International Criminal Court: Would the Article 25(3)(c) ‘purpose’ requirement really matter?
|
|
Mens Rea and complicity during the Holocaust – the case of Westerbork camp commander, Albert Gemmeker
|
|
George Floyd, Mitch Henriquez and criminal liability for police bystanders
|
|
Money as Complicity: Can banking and finance services facilitate international crimes?
|
|
Secondary Liability and Terrorism – Spill-over to other international crimes?
|
|
Death Penalty Assurances and the Data Protection Act – Fixing a Hole? The case of Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department
|
|
Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Liability Gap, Part One: Introduction to Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Criminal Liability
|
|
The Cases of Kouwenhoven and Poch and the Fine Line Between Guilt and Innocence for Assisting in the Commission of War Crimes
|
|
Recent Domestic Developments on Corporate Criminal Assistance in Atrocity Crimes
|
