|
Human Rights Due Diligence is the Future: Corporate Perspectives (1 June, 15:00-17:00)
|
|
Risky Business: will TotalEnergies be complicit in international crimes if it continues doing business in Russia?
|
|
Civil liability in the EU proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive: a leap forward or stifling progress?
|
|
A clear risk of what? The Egyptian navy, the Dutch arms export policy and linguistic inconsistencies in the EU Common Position
|
|
The Promise of Shareholder Rebellions for Business and Human Rights
|
|
‘Knock Knock’: On respect for autonomy as a criterion for rules of secondary liability
|
|
Shell/Nigeria: the fight over secondary liability of parent companies over corporate human rights violations by their subsidiaries
|
|
Access to supply chain information: stopped at the border by customs?
|
|
Establishing secondary liability by creating transparency: a role for civil society?
|
|
Money as Complicity: Can banking and finance services facilitate international crimes?
|
|
Re-reviving the Alien Tort Statute for Human Rights Claims
|
|
Putting an End to the Application of Foreign Law in Cross-Border Tort Cases for Serious Human Rights Violations?
|
|
Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Liability Gap, Part One: Introduction to Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Criminal Liability
|
|
The UK Vedanta Case and Parent Company Liability
|
|
Bringing Transnational Human Rights Torts Cases Against Powerful Actors of the Global North
|
|
Human Rights Due Diligence: Turning Ideals into Law
|
